Fashionable nonsense: postmodem Intellectuals’ abuse or science. I Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont. p. em. Includes bibliographical references and Index. Fashionable Nonsense by Alan Sokal Explaining Postmodernism by Stephen R.C. Hicks Why People Believe Weird Things by Michael Shermer The Dictionary . A review and a link to other reviews of Fashionable Nonsense by Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont.
|Published (Last):||23 January 2015|
|PDF File Size:||12.80 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Second if as stated previously in the quote: The two also attempt to explain, to noneense popular audience, some of the theoretical arguments and discussions that have occurred throughout the history of the philosophy or sociology of science; thinkers such as Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, and Paul Feyeraband are taken into account.
Humorous and tragic, illuminating and infuriating. Responses from the scientific community were more supportive. In a sense, epistemic relativism lies at the heart of what Sokal and Bricmont are criticizing.
Fink says that “Lacan could easily assume that his faithful seminar public But how are we to tell the difference? This book is extremely charitible to the subject of its critique, in fact, but charity can only be taken so far. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
But of course if everyone had this cast of mind, then these authors would not have the renown they do. Then read the Epilogue, which is very engaging, beautifully written, and does a fabulous job at summarizing his points.
fashkonable Aug 07, Leila T. The notorious parody written by Alan Sokal and published by a gullible gang of academics at Social Text is one of the sadder chapters in modern American academia. The complete review ‘s Review:. But a philosopher who is caught equating the erectile organ to the square root of minus one has, for my money, blown his credentials when it comes to things that I don’t know anything about.
It does not mean stating unequivocally, especially if the statements are so inane and absurd that they must or at least should be dismissed as simply meaningless.
A major portion of the book is given over to reproductions of original ‘postmodernist’ sources that ramble for pages on end, with trifling comments by the authors on how the different scientific concepts have been nonsfnse or misused.
Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science by Alan Sokal
It was completely relevant to my interests. As there was a point when I did not have enough knowledge to dismiss it and still had a sense that is was a frightful brew that does not make sense. Aug 25, Yves rated it it was amazing Shelves: He also co-authored a book on quantum triviality. One type is misunderstanding of math or theoretical physics in itself — say, when an author misquotes a mathematical definition.
In it Sokal wrote, “I confess that I am an unabashed Old Leftist who never quite understood how deconstruction was supposed to help the working class.
These excerpts are painful to read. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. Rather, they aim to draw attention to the abuse of concepts from mathematics and physics, subjects they’ve devoted their careers to studying and teaching. Feb 18, Justin soka, it liked it.
Sokal set out to reveal how one aspect of postmodernism was fraudulent, and in doing so seemed to invariably reduce that particular style of thinking and writing to what it truly is: Our two cents re.
Fashionable Nonsense (Intellectual Impostures) – Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont
Not a lucid one, surely, for clarity would expose your lack of content. This book, like much of Sokal’s work, is aimed at debunking the modern powerhouses of literary criticism, by the simple act of pointing out that their rhetoric, definitions, and understanding of the scientific principles they invoke are entirely flawed and amount to nonsense.
I can easily imagine what the French intellectuals are doing. Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life. Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go. Postmodern medicine that tastes good! In a delightfully witty and clear voice, the two thoughtfully and thoroughly dismantle the pseudo-scientific writings of some of the most fashionable French and American intellectuals.
I wanted to like this, I really did.
Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science
Thus science is mere politics, another Western bias, nothing whatsoever to do with the realities of nature. Sokal followed up by co-authoring the book Impostures Intellectuelles with Jean Bricmont in published in English, a year later, as Fashionable Nonsense. Yet I was asking something which is about the scientific equivalent of: Some critics do, however, have the gall to suggest that this is immaterial, that the ideas these great thinkers propound and propose are so significant that the use of false, misleading, and irrelevant evidence to support them is perfectly valid.
The potentialities of nonsense are a larger infinity than those of rationality, itself, as Sokal univentively connected, undermined within mathematics. Physics is a subject that is genuinely very difficult. Kindle Edition Verified Purchase. For example, he wrote about the Gulf War as follows: I speak as someone who understands and appreciates science, here, dammit, and I don’t like the reputation he’s giving it.
A major portion of the book is given over to reproductions of original ‘postmodernist’ sources that ramble for pages on end, with trifling comments by the authors on how the different scientific concepts have been misinterpre Although this is an important book, it is not a very enjoyable one to read, for the simple fact that the authors felt compelled to quote at length from some of the most disfigured and meaningless jumbles of words that I have ever seen sewn together in the guise of sentences.
But there is another, second kind of error: Sokal received his B.